Takeaways from the 2024 voting season

Author(s)
Marion Plouhinec
Published on
July 11, 2024
Read time
3 minute(s) read

For Carmignac, the Annual General Meeting (AGM) season represents an opportunity to make our voice heard through voting. In the interest of transparency, we want to share how we voted at the shareholder meetings of the companies we invest in through our portfolios under management.

64%Votes in support of shareholder-led resolutions (52% - 2023)
61%Of meetings had at least one vote against management (54% - 2023)
12%Of total votes against management (9% - 2023)

Shareholder-led resolutions

What’s next?

Management resolutions : Executive Pay

Executive pay is a headline-grabbing topic every year. Indeed, this year’s extraordinary USD 50 billion package for Tesla’s CEO, Elon Musk, certainly raised some eyebrows! While it’s fair to say this was exceptional, there was no shortage of debates this year.

Our pay-package votes are primarily driven by our assessment of the alignment between executive pay and the long-term performance of the business. In other words, we want to ensure that management is sufficiently incentivised to drive the company forward and held to account over its progress.

We voted against 23% of all remuneration resolutions of our investee companies. This represents an increase compared to 15% last year. The three main reasons were:

  • Lack of performance-related metrics. This tends to be a prevalent issue in North America.
  • Insufficient performance targets, allowing sizeable reward even in cases of underperformance.
  • A box-ticking approach to environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors. Instead, executive pay should be linked to the long-term ESG risks and opportunities that are, or are likely to become, financially material for the company.

Shareholder-led resolutions

The filling of resolutions by shareholders at AGMs is a fundamental tool in ensuring minority shareholders can hold boards accountable.

During the 2024 voting season, we voted on 146 shareholder-led resolutions (109 in 2023) and we supported 64% of them (52% in 2023). While it is challenging to compare year-on-year voting data given the evolution in the composition of our portfolios we observed a notable rise in the number of governance-related shareholder-led resolutions. In 2023, we voted on 50 governance-led resolutions, whereas in 2024, this number increased to 83. Our increased level of support for these resolutions also grew from 50% to 69%, which reflects both the improvement in quality and the important contribution they play to the advancement of minority shareholder rights.

One growing trend is the use of AGMs as a forum for confrontation between anti-ESG proponents and those wishing to hold corporations to account for ‘doing good’, without adequately considering financial materiality of the topic in focus. This is an area of concern given the increasing number of resolutions, on a continuously expanding range of issues, including some of a political nature, risks overshadowing financially material and critical ESG issues.

Given the nuance of these debates, we always take a case-by-case approach to voting on these resolutions. We believe the most appropriate approach is to ensure we only support resolutions which tackle relevant issues, are not overly prescriptive or burdensome, and are genuinely constructive on ESG issues.

Below are some of the significant shareholder-led resolutions we voted on this season. They have received various levels of support1. A significant level of support, above 30%, for a shareholder-led resolution, or 20% against a management-led resolution sends a strong signal to the board that shareholders expect more action on a specific issue. It is sometimes the only means by which minority shareholders can communicate this. This is especially the case in companies with a shareholder that holds a controlling stake.

In-focus topics

For several years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been a key topic for businesses across sectors. But a tension is emerging between companies’ commitment to ‘safe’ development and their commercial incentives. This was a prominent topic of discussion this year, putting the shareholder-oriented versus stakeholder-oriented governance models to the test. The leadership issues at OpenAI towards the end of 2023, were a great illustration. We recognise the significance of this matter and believe that shareholder-led resolutions play a crucial role in demonstrating investor support for responsible AI development and use.

Accordingly, we recently backed a shareholder-led resolution at Meta’s2 2024 AGM. The resolution called for the board to provide a report evaluating the risks associated with the company's involvement in the dissemination or generation of misinformation and disinformation through AI. Additionally, the resolution requested information on the company's plans to address the harmful effects. While the company asserts that the board is responsible for overseeing the risks related to AI-generated content and has implemented relevant policies, we believe the firm and its stakeholders would benefit from such a report. We also took into account the scrutiny of regulators on this topic. Lastly, it was important for us to signal to the company our expectations for the implementation of effective controls in the responsible development of AI. The resolution received approximately 17% of support from shareholders. We think this is a significant level of support, taking into account the significant voting rights of the founder and CEO (approximately 61%).

Changing consumer preferences, regulatory advancements, and systemic risk considerations related to unhealthy foods are bringing the future of nutrition to the fore. This is a long-term focus theme for Carmignac.

We supported a resolution on this topic at the AGM of the consumer-staples company Nestle3. It called for more transparency from the board regarding its use of the government-endorsed nutrient profiling model. It also requested that a specific target was set for the percentage of sales made up by ‘healthy’ products.

The company has taken several steps to develop healthy products in its portfolio, including setting a target of increasing healthy product sales by CHF 25-30 billion by 2030. It has also implemented initiatives such as voluntary reporting on the nutritional value of its entire portfolio using a government-backed nutrient profiling model.

We decided to support this resolution to send a signal to the board about the importance of further developing the company's healthy food portfolio strategy. It encourages the board to be more transparent about its ambitions, without being overly prescriptive. The resolution received 11% support from shareholders.

At financial services company, Capital One’s4 AGM, we supported a resolution asking for the company to adopt greenhouse gas emissions targets associated with lending and investment activities. The company does not currently disclose these while a number of its peers have done so already, despite having calculated them internally. This would give shareholders more insight into the company’s broader decarbonisation targets. The resolution received approximately 10% support from shareholders.

Home Depot5, the world's largest home improvement retailer, has significant exposure to biodiversity and deforestation risks, making this topic material for the company. At its 2024 AGM, we supported a resolution requesting the disclosure of a biodiversity impact assessment. We took into account the company’s scores on third-party sustainability surveys, indicating that it would benefit from strengthening its biodiversity assessment and strategy. Additionally, despite the fact that the company has sustainable procurement policies, we note it has been involved in deforestation controversies and believe it should improve its reporting by directly disclosing its efforts to prevent deforestation in its reporting. The resolution received approximately 16% support from shareholders.

To demonstrate strong leadership on the board of widely-held companies, we generally expect the role of the CEO and board chair to be kept separate as their responsibilities differ.
Although we approach this on a strictly case-by-case basis, we supported resolutions that ask for the appointment of an independent board chair at financial services company Intercontinental Exchange6 (30% support from shareholders), industrials company General Electric7 (12% support), consumer-staples company Colgate-Palmolive8 (34% support) and materials company Ecolab9 (34% support) given the size and strategy of these firms.

Another important mechanism for the protection of minority shareholders’ interests is the ‘one share, one vote’ structure that ensures all shares have voting rights and that those rights correspond to the economic value held. We supported resolutions asking for a recapitalisation to one-share, one-vote at big tech companies Meta10 and Alphabet’s11 AGMs. The resolutions respectively received approximately 26% and 31% support from shareholders. Again, we think this is quite significant given both companies have a significant shareholder (Zuckerberg holds about 61% of the voting rights at Meta and Page and Brin about 50% of the voting rights at Alphabet12).

We believe that employees are key to the success of a company and the financial materiality of employee satisfaction is increasingly recognised. At Amazon’s13 AGM, we supported a shareholder-led resolution asking for third-party assessment on the company’s commitment to freedom of association and collective bargaining, and a resolution asking the company to commission a third-party audit on working conditions. The company is continuously involved in a number of controversies on these two topics. We believe it would be beneficial for shareholders to understand how it is managing these risks. We will also continue to engage with the company on this topic, given the consistent levels of support from shareholders year after year (slightly more than 30% support from shareholders).

What’s next?

We use our vote to signal concerns to the boards of the companies we are invested in but our active ownership activity does not stop here. Through engagement and dialogue with companies, we seek to influence change and complement our voting activity.

For more information on our approach to engagement, please consult our Engagement Policy14.

1The percentage levels of support provided in this document are approximate and have been calculated by Carmignac based on the company's regulatory disclosures. 2Resolution 6 - Report on Generative AI Misinformation and Disinformation Risks, AGM 29 May 2024. 3Resolution 7 - Report on Non-Financial Matters Regarding Sales of Healthier and Less Healthy Foods, AGM 18 April 2024. 4Resolution 5 - Adopt GHG Emissions Reduction Targets Associated with Lending and Investment Activities, AGM 2 May 2024. 5Resolution 8 - Disclose a Biodiversity Impact and Dependency Assessment, AGM 16 May 2024. 6Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 17 May 2024. 7Now GE Aerospace. Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 7 May 2024. 8Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 10 May 2024. 9Resolution 4 - Require Independent Board Chair, AGM 2 May 2024. 10Resolution 5 - Approve Recapitalization Plan for all Stock to Have One-vote per Share, AGM 29 May 2024. 11Resolution 9 - Approve Recapitalization Plan for all Stock to Have One-vote per Share, AGM 7 June 2024. 12Source: company proxy statement. 13Resolution 12 - Commission Third Party Assessment on Company's Commitment to Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining and resolution 17 - Commission a Third Party Audit on Working Conditions, AGM 22 May 2024. 14 https://carmidoc.carmignac.com/ESGEP_INT_en.pdf

Sustainable Investment

Learn more about our approach to sustainable investingOur Approach

Share

Related articles

Sustainable investing • July 10, 2024 • English

Carmignac’s Article 9 funds: a sustainable investment?

3 minute(s) read
Find out more
Sustainable investing • October 15, 2021 • English

Carmignac receives the ‘Label ISR’ for five additional funds

1 minute(s) read
Find out more
All analysis

Marketing communication. Please refer to the KID/KIID, prospectus of the fund before making any final investment decisions. This document is intended for professional clients.

This material may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior authorisation from the Management Company. This material does not constitute a subscription offer, nor does it constitute investment advice. This material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice. This material has been provided to you for informational purposes only and may not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or interests referred to herein or for any other purposes. The information contained in this material may be partial information and may be modified without prior notice. They are expressed as of the date of writing and are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by Carmignac to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by Carmignac, its officers, employees or agents.

Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Performances are net of fees (excluding possible entrance fees charged by the distributor). The return may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations, for the shares which are not currency-hedged.

Reference to certain securities and financial instruments is for illustrative purposes to highlight stocks that are or have been included in the portfolios of funds in the Carmignac range. This is not intended to promote direct investment in those instruments, nor does it constitute investment advice. The Management Company is not subject to prohibition on trading in these instruments prior to issuing any communication. The portfolios of Carmignac funds may change without previous notice. The reference to a ranking or prize, is no guarantee of the future results of the UCIS or the manager.

Morningstar Rating™ : © Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; may not be copied or distributed; and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.

Access to the Funds may be subject to restrictions regarding certain persons or countries. This material is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where (by reason of that person’s nationality, residence or otherwise) the material or availability of this material is prohibited. Persons in respect of whom such prohibitions apply must not access this material. Taxation depends on the situation of the individual. The Funds are not registered for retail distribution in Asia, in Japan, in North America, nor are they registered in South America. Carmignac Funds are registered in Singapore as restricted foreign scheme (for professional clients only). The Funds have not been registered under the US Securities Act of 1933. The Funds may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, for the benefit or on behalf of a «U.S. person», according to the definition of the US Regulation S and FATCA.
The risks, fees and ongoing charges are described in the KID (Key Information Document). The KID must be made available to the subscriber prior to subscription. The subscriber must read the KID. Investors may lose some or all their capital, as the capital in the funds are not guaranteed. The Funds present a risk of loss of capital.

The Funds’ prospectus, KIDs, NAVs and annual reports are available at www.carmignac.com, or upon request to the Management Carmignac Portfolio refers to the sub-funds of Carmignac Portfolio SICAV, an investment company under Luxembourg law, conforming to the UCITS Directive. The French investment funds (fonds communs de placement or FCP) are common funds in contractual form conforming to the UCITS or AIFM Directive under French law.

  • In France, Luxembourg, Sweden: The risks, fees and ongoing charges are described in the KID (Key Information Document). The KID must be made available to the subscriber prior to subscription. The subscriber must read the KID. Investors may lose some or all their capital, as the capital in the funds are not guaranteed. The Funds present a risk of loss of capital. The Funds’ prospectus, KIDs, NAV and annual reports are available at www.carmignac.com, or upon request to the Management.

  • In the United Kingdom: the Funds’ respective prospectuses, KIIDs and annual reports are available at www.carmignac.co.uk, or upon request to the Management Company, or for the French Funds, at the offices of the Facilities Agent at BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES SERVICES, operating through its branch in London: 55 Moorgate, London EC2R. This document was prepared by Carmignac Gestion, Carmignac Gestion Luxembourg or Carmignac UK Ltd. FP Carmignac ICVC (the “Company”) is an Investment Company with variable capital incorporated in England and Wales under registered number 839620 and is authorised by the FCA with effect from 4 April 2019 and launched on 15 May 2019. FundRock Partners Limited is the Authorised Corporate Director (the “ACD”) of the Company and is authorised and regulated by the FCA. Registered Office: Hamilton Centre, Rodney Way, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 3BY, UK; Registered in England and Wales with number 4162989. Carmignac Gestion Luxembourg SA has been appointed as the Investment Manager and distributor in respect of the Company. Carmignac UK Ltd (Registered in England and Wales with number 14162894) has been appointed as a sub-Investment Manager of the Company and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority with FRN:984288.

  • In Switzerland: the prospectus, KIDs and annual report are available at www.carmignac.ch, or through our representative in Switzerland, CACEIS (Switzerland), S.A., Route de Signy 35, CH-1260 Nyon. The paying agent is CACEIS Bank, Montrouge, Nyon Branch / Switzerland, Route de Signy 35, 1260 Nyon.

The Management Company can cease promotion in your country anytime.
Investors have access to a summary of their rights in English on the following links: UK ; Switzerland ; France ; Luxembourg ; Sweden.